New survey shows TPIs at risk of being left behind on technology

The results from our new survey covering opinions of business energy suppliers on third party intermediaries (TPIs) are published today. It is clear that the suppliers strongly recognise the important role of TPIs in the business supply markets, but equally clear that there is much more to be done in the sector.

First on the list is embracing technological change. There appears to be a discrepancy between what suppliers think are the most important avenues of growth (the likes of demand side response services and connected technology are high up the list), and what TPIs can currently offer to customers. There is a technological risk for TPIs – many do not have the in-house expertise to fully understand flexibility propositions – which shows in the slow take up of these services. There are of course TPIs that do offer a wide range of energy services, and these are painted in a positive light by the suppliers responding to our survey. But the feeling from suppliers was that if TPIs are too focused on the “transactional” part of the business, they will be left behind as the market moves at pace towards flexibility.

Another outcome from the survey was the caution with which suppliers approach the TPI sector. For larger suppliers, this tends to take the form of capped commissions, strict credit policies or prescriptive guidelines. Smaller suppliers may be limited simply by their comparatively limited resources, or a desire to only work with TPIs that share their (often strong) ethical values. Either way, there is a recognition of the reputational risk for suppliers of working with TPIs that do not meet their standards.

On a similar note, TPI commissions were a hot topic in this survey. No suppliers felt commissions were fair, although some did say they were representative of the market. There were numerous calls for more transparency, openness and fairness in the market, especially when asking suppliers what would improve their relationship with TPIs, or when discussing regulation of the sector.

Much of the feedback received through the survey focused on where TPIs can do more, but it was made clear that the channel remains suppliers’ most important route to market – indeed, 83% of respondents put TPIs in their top two sales channels. TPIs will continue to be an crucial route to market in non-domestic energy supply, but if they are to thrive in a rapidly changing landscape, it is clear that they will have to move with the times.

Our first survey of suppliers’ opinions on TPIs is available now. To find out more, please contact Robert Buckley on 01603 604400 or enquiries@cornwall-insight.com.

Related thinking

Business supply and services

The energy crisis affects businesses as well as households

Yesterday morning we issued our updated forecasts for the Default Tariff Cap through to the end of 2023. They make for grim reading: from 1 October 2022 the Cap will average £3,500/year equivalent or so for at least a year, unless there is a collapse in the wholesale energy markets....

Business supply and services

Ofgem reaches conclusion for the Microbusiness Strategic Review

The Microbusiness Strategic Review came to a close on 28 March 2022, with four finalised proposals from Ofgem that aim to protect microbusiness consumers and create a more robust framework through which the market can operate. Following the unprecedented rise in wholesale prices and recent geopolitical events, these changes are...

Business supply and services

Why now? Regulation in the TPI market

Ofgem published its long-awaited policy proposals on 29 July following a review of the microbusiness sector. These build on its initial consultation from May 2019 and look to ensure that microbusinesses can access a competitive market and secure adequate levels of protection. The approach will be a defining moment for...

Business supply and services

All mod cons: Routes to market for household flexibility

According to National Grid’s 2019 Future Energy Scenarios[1], meeting decarbonisation targets could require deployment in GB of 13GW of flexibility from commercial and industrial consumers by 2050, compared to around 1GW currently available. While there are currently no comparable forecasts for domestic demand-side response (DSR), energy suppliers and technology companies...

Energy storage and flexibility

FiT costs to reach all-time high amid COVID outbreak

Energy Third Party Charges (TPCs) have certainly been in the limelight recently, and rightly so as less consumption from non-domestic sectors is resulting in a greater recovery of money from domestic households amid the COVID-19 outbreak. Several measures have been taken to date to protect domestic suppliers and consumers from...

Business supply and services

Three key themes taking place in the TPI sector

While discussion continues around the impacts of COVID-19 on energy suppliers, the effects have reached into all parts of the energy value chain. Here, we take a look at the impacts on the TPI sector, alongside other key developments in the TPI market, highlighted in our second quarterly update of...

Home supply and services

From “what if?” to “what now?”

As the UK begins its third week of lockdown, the nation’s energy sector continues to wait to see whether there will be any economic or financial support targeted specifically at end users, suppliers, network operators and fellow participants alike. Immediate issues for end users include their ability to pay their...

Home supply and services

Not mushroom for competitive prices: Switching behaviours in the SEM

The Commission for the Regulation of Utilities (CRU) published its August 2019 Customer Switching Report for the Electricity and Gas Retail Markets on 24 September. In this edition of the blog, we compare monthly switching trends with CRU’s quarterly Electricity and Gas Retail Markets Report to explore whether fluctuations in...